Comparison · Zhipu vs DeepSeek

GLM 5.3 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: pricing, allowances and benchmarks

GLM 5.3 (Zhipu) and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (DeepSeek): 5 shared subscriptions and 6 shared leaderboard snapshots, with workloads, sample dates and benchmark configurations.

Plan & benchmark data snapshot · How real prices are computed

As of 2026-10-16, 5 of 5 shared subscriptions use matching normalized workloads: GLM 5.3 has a lower recorded token cost on 0, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash on 5, with 0 tied. Their highest archived configurations score 44.78 and 39.46 on Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3; all 6 shared leaderboard snapshots, configurations and sources appear below.

Shared subscriptions
5Both models available
Comparable workloads
5Used for price ratios
Shared leaderboards
6Highest archived configurations
Official API prices
2/ 2Models with list prices
Makers
Zhipu · DeepSeek
Model pages
GLM 5.3 · DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Model IDs
glm-5.3 · deepseek-v4.1-flash
Comparison method
Workloads, shared quotas and benchmark limits

Plot both on the price–capability chart

Same plan, side by side

Each row is a subscription that includes both models at the same fee. Real cost = monthly fee ÷ the recorded monthly allowance. Each model's allowance assumes using the plan for that model; the columns cannot be added together. Click a price for its calculation and sources. Ratios use only matching normalized workloads.

Plans that include both GLM 5.3 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Plan / providerMonthly feeGLM 5.3DeepSeek V4.1 FlashRecorded token cost
Command Code GOATCommand Code$10/mo$0.1546 /MTok 0.065B tokens/month Standard workload 2026-09-30 · official source date · confidence Medium$0.00161 /MTok 6.211B tokens/month Standard workload 2026-09-30 · official source date · confidence MediumDeepSeek V4.1 Flash lower96× price ratio (higher/lower)
OpenCode GoOpenCode$10/mo$0.2062 /MTok 0.049B tokens/month Standard workload 2026-09-30 · official source date · confidence Medium$0.00161 /MTok 6.211B tokens/month Standard workload 2026-09-30 · official source date · confidence MediumDeepSeek V4.1 Flash lower128.1× price ratio (higher/lower)
Ollama ProOllama$20/mo$0.1031 /MTok 0.194B tokens/month Standard workload 2026-09-06 · official source date · confidence Medium$0.00322 /MTok 6.211B tokens/month Standard workload 2026-09-11 · official source date · confidence MediumDeepSeek V4.1 Flash lower32× price ratio (higher/lower)
Ollama MaxOllama$100/mo$0.1031 /MTok 0.97B tokens/month Standard workload 2026-09-06 · official source date · confidence Medium$0.00322 /MTok 31.056B tokens/month Standard workload 2026-09-11 · official source date · confidence MediumDeepSeek V4.1 Flash lower32× price ratio (higher/lower)
Droid MaxFactory$200/mo$0.02771 /MTok 7.217B tokens/month Anthropic workload 2026-09-29 · derived; uses the data date of Droid Max · claude-opus-5.5 · confidence Medium$0.00594 /MTok 33.68B tokens/month Anthropic workload 2026-09-29 · derived; uses the data date of Droid Max · claude-opus-5.5 · confidence MediumDeepSeek V4.1 Flash lower4.67× price ratio (higher/lower)

Leaderboards head to head

Each model's highest archived configuration on each shared leaderboard snapshot, ranked among the models archived in this dataset. Harness, reasoning effort and service mode can differ; self-reported and estimated results are marked. These reference configurations are not measurements of the subscriptions above. Overlapping leaderboards do not form an overall ability rating.

GLM 5.3 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash on independent leaderboards
LeaderboardMetricGLM 5.3DeepSeek V4.1 FlashHigher archived score
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3Intelligence Index44.78 #14 / 60 · GLM-5.3 (max) Max 2026-10-01 · Record39.46 #25 / 60 · DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max) Max 2026-10-01 · RecordGLM 5.3+5.32
Terminal-Bench 4.0Resolution Rate %41.82 #6 / 18 · Claude Code - GLM-5.3 (max) Claude Code · Max Reported interval 38.59–45.05 2026-10-01 · Record31.2 self-reported #9 / 18 · DeepSeek Harness Minimal - DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max) DeepSeek Harness Minimal · Max 2026-09-12 · RecordGLM 5.3+10.62
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA)Resolution Rate %41.92 #9 / 53 · Artificial Analysis - GLM-5.3 (max) Artificial Analysis · Max 2026-10-01 · Record26.77 #17 / 53 · Artificial Analysis - DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max) Artificial Analysis · Max 2026-10-01 · RecordGLM 5.3+15.15
Code Arena | WebDev OverallArena Score1,622 #15 / 54 · glm-5.3-max Max Reported interval 1,613.8–1,630.2 2026-10-01 · Record1,620 #16 / 54 · deepseek-v4.1-flash-max Max Reported interval 1,609.6–1,630.4 2026-10-01 · RecordGLM 5.3+2
Agent Arena · Overall (Ranking / Pareto)Net Improvement %2.57 #19 / 39 · GLM 5.3 (Max) Max Reported interval 1.85–3.29 2026-10-01 · Record4.01 #13 / 39 · Deepseek V4.1 Flash (Max) Max Reported interval 3.51–4.51 2026-10-01 · RecordDeepSeek V4.1 Flash+1.44
DeepSWE v1.1Pass@1 %68.96 #10 / 33 · mini-swe-agent - glm-5-3 (max) mini-swe-agent · Max Reported interval 65.94–71.98 2026-09-12 · Record74.2 self-reported #1 / 33 · mini-SWE - DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max) mini-SWE · Max 2026-09-12 · RecordDeepSeek V4.1 Flash+5.24

Official API pricing

Each row uses its listed pricing conditions. Cache writes are shown separately; subscription costs above retain their recorded quota basis. An em dash means that rate is not recorded.

List price per million tokens
Model / pricing conditionsCached inputInputCache writeOutput
GLM 5.3Upstream referenceUpstream price reference$0.26$1.4—$4.4
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashUpstream referenceUpstream price reference$0.006$0.3—$1.2

How to read this comparison

Price ratios compare recorded USD/MTok under the same known workload. Raw measured totals, different workloads and unmetered access remain visible but are excluded from the lower-cost counts. Recorded allowances assume using the quota; your effective cost depends on utilization, cache mix, output mix and plan limits. Qualitative confidence is not an error bar.

Methodology and sources

More comparisons

All comparisons