Comparison · Anthropic vs Zhipu
Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GLM 5.3: pricing, allowances and benchmarks
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Anthropic) and GLM 5.3 (Zhipu): 2 shared subscriptions and 4 shared leaderboard snapshots, with workloads, sample dates and benchmark configurations.
Plan & benchmark data snapshot · How real prices are computed
As of 2026-10-16, 2 of 2 shared subscriptions use matching normalized workloads: Claude Sonnet 5.5 has a lower recorded token cost on 0, GLM 5.3 on 2, with 0 tied. Their highest archived configurations score 55.98 and 44.78 on Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3; all 4 shared leaderboard snapshots, configurations and sources appear below.
- Shared subscriptions
- 2Both models available
- Comparable workloads
- 2Used for price ratios
- Shared leaderboards
- 4Highest archived configurations
- Official API prices
- 2/ 2Models with list prices
Plot both on the price–capability chart
Same plan, side by side
Each row is a subscription that includes both models at the same fee. Real cost = monthly fee ÷ the recorded monthly allowance. Each model's allowance assumes using the plan for that model; the columns cannot be added together. Click a price for its calculation and sources. Ratios use only matching normalized workloads.
| Plan / provider | Monthly fee | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | GLM 5.3 | Recorded token cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Command Code GOATCommand Code | $10/mo | $0.2941 /MTok 0.034B tokens/month Standard workload 2026-09-30 · official source date · confidence Medium | $0.1546 /MTok 0.065B tokens/month Standard workload 2026-09-30 · official source date · confidence Medium | GLM 5.3 lower1.9× price ratio (higher/lower) |
| Droid MaxFactory | $200/mo | $0.03959 /MTok 5.052B tokens/month Anthropic workload 2026-09-29 · derived; uses the data date of Droid Max · claude-opus-5.5 · confidence Medium | $0.02771 /MTok 7.217B tokens/month Anthropic workload 2026-09-29 · derived; uses the data date of Droid Max · claude-opus-5.5 · confidence Medium | GLM 5.3 lower1.43× price ratio (higher/lower) |
Leaderboards head to head
Each model's highest archived configuration on each shared leaderboard snapshot, ranked among the models archived in this dataset. Harness, reasoning effort and service mode can differ; self-reported and estimated results are marked. These reference configurations are not measurements of the subscriptions above. Overlapping leaderboards do not form an overall ability rating.
| Leaderboard | Metric | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | GLM 5.3 | Higher archived score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3 | Intelligence Index | 55.98 #2 / 60 · Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max with fallback) Max 2026-10-01 · Record | 44.78 #14 / 60 · GLM-5.3 (max) Max 2026-10-01 · Record | Claude Sonnet 5.5+11.2 |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) | Resolution Rate % | 63.64 #1 / 53 · Artificial Analysis - Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max with fallback) Artificial Analysis · Max 2026-10-01 · Record | 41.92 #9 / 53 · Artificial Analysis - GLM-5.3 (max) Artificial Analysis · Max 2026-10-01 · Record | Claude Sonnet 5.5+21.72 |
| Code Arena | WebDev Overall | Arena Score | 1,709 #5 / 54 · claude-sonnet-5.5-high High Reported interval 1,693.4–1,724.6 2026-10-01 · Record | 1,622 #15 / 54 · glm-5.3-max Max Reported interval 1,613.8–1,630.2 2026-10-01 · Record | Claude Sonnet 5.5+87 |
| Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v1.5 | Coding Agent Index | 68.36 #1 / 19 · Claude Code - Sonnet 5.5 (max) Claude Code · Max 2026-10-01 · Record | 53.55 #11 / 19 · Opencode - GLM-5.3 ({'reasoning_effort': 'max'}) Opencode · Max 2026-10-01 · Record | Claude Sonnet 5.5+14.8 |
Official API pricing
Each row uses its listed pricing conditions. Cache writes are shown separately; subscription costs above retain their recorded quota basis. An em dash means that rate is not recorded.
| Model / pricing conditions | Cached input | Input | Cache write | Output |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 5.5Upstream referenceUpstream price reference | $0.1 | $2 | — | $10 |
| GLM 5.3Upstream referenceUpstream price reference | $0.26 | $1.4 | — | $4.4 |
How to read this comparison
Price ratios compare recorded USD/MTok under the same known workload. Raw measured totals, different workloads and unmetered access remain visible but are excluded from the lower-cost counts. Recorded allowances assume using the quota; your effective cost depends on utilization, cache mix, output mix and plan limits. Qualitative confidence is not an error bar.
- Standard workload: 97% cache reads / 2.5% input / 0.5% output
- Anthropic workload: 97% cache reads / 2.5% cache writes / 0.5% output