Comparison · Anthropic

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: pricing, allowances and benchmarks

Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic) and Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Anthropic): 4 shared subscriptions and 4 shared leaderboard snapshots, with workloads, sample dates and benchmark configurations.

Plan & benchmark data snapshot · How real prices are computed

As of 2026-10-16, 4 of 4 shared subscriptions use matching normalized workloads: Claude Opus 5.5 has a lower recorded token cost on 0, Claude Sonnet 5.5 on 4, with 0 tied. Their highest archived configurations score 57.62 and 55.98 on Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3; all 4 shared leaderboard snapshots, configurations and sources appear below.

Shared subscriptions
4Both models available
Comparable workloads
4Used for price ratios
Shared leaderboards
4Highest archived configurations
Official API prices
2/ 2Models with list prices
Makers
Anthropic
Model pages
Claude Opus 5.5 · Claude Sonnet 5.5
Model IDs
claude-opus-5.5 · claude-sonnet-5.5
Comparison method
Workloads, shared quotas and benchmark limits

Plot both on the price–capability chart

Same plan, side by side

Each row is a subscription that includes both models at the same fee. Real cost = monthly fee ÷ the recorded monthly allowance. Each model's allowance assumes using the plan for that model; the columns cannot be added together. Click a price for its calculation and sources. Ratios use only matching normalized workloads.

Plans that include both Claude Opus 5.5 and Claude Sonnet 5.5
Plan / providerMonthly feeClaude Opus 5.5Claude Sonnet 5.5Recorded token cost
Claude ProAnthropic$20/mo$0.00655 /MTok 3.054B tokens/month Anthropic workload 2026-09-22 – 2026-09-27 · sampled · confidence High$0.00327 /MTok 6.108B tokens/month Anthropic workload 2026-09-22 – 2026-09-27 · derived; uses the data date of Claude Pro · claude-opus-5.5 · confidence LowClaude Sonnet 5.5 lower2× price ratio (higher/lower)
Claude Max 5x (9/14+)Anthropic$100/mo$0.00545 /MTok 18.334B tokens/month Anthropic workload 2026-09-29 – 2026-10-03 · sampled · confidence Medium$0.00273 /MTok 36.668B tokens/month Anthropic workload 2026-09-29 – 2026-10-03 · derived; uses the data date of Claude Max 5x (9/14+) · claude-opus-5.5 · confidence LowClaude Sonnet 5.5 lower2× price ratio (higher/lower)
Claude Max 20x (9/14+)Anthropic$200/mo$0.00634 /MTok 31.538B tokens/month Anthropic workload 2026-09-22 – 2026-09-27 · sampled · confidence Medium$0.00317 /MTok 63.076B tokens/month Anthropic workload 2026-09-22 – 2026-09-27 · derived; uses the data date of Claude Max 20x (9/14+) · claude-opus-5.5 · confidence LowClaude Sonnet 5.5 lower2× price ratio (higher/lower)
Droid MaxFactory$200/mo$0.07918 /MTok 2.526B tokens/month Anthropic workload 2026-09-29 · sampled · confidence Medium$0.03959 /MTok 5.052B tokens/month Anthropic workload 2026-09-29 · derived; uses the data date of Droid Max · claude-opus-5.5 · confidence MediumClaude Sonnet 5.5 lower2× price ratio (higher/lower)

Leaderboards head to head

Each model's highest archived configuration on each shared leaderboard snapshot, ranked among the models archived in this dataset. Harness, reasoning effort and service mode can differ; self-reported and estimated results are marked. These reference configurations are not measurements of the subscriptions above. Overlapping leaderboards do not form an overall ability rating.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 on independent leaderboards
LeaderboardMetricClaude Opus 5.5Claude Sonnet 5.5Higher archived score
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3Intelligence Index57.62 #1 / 60 · Claude Opus 5.5 (max with fallback) Max 2026-10-01 · Record55.98 #2 / 60 · Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max with fallback) Max 2026-10-01 · RecordClaude Opus 5.5+1.64
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA)Resolution Rate %59.6 #2 / 53 · Artificial Analysis - Claude Opus 5.5 (max with fallback) Artificial Analysis · Max 2026-10-01 · Record63.64 #1 / 53 · Artificial Analysis - Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max with fallback) Artificial Analysis · Max 2026-10-01 · RecordClaude Sonnet 5.5+4.04
Code Arena | WebDev OverallArena Score1,818 #1 / 54 · claude-opus-5.5-max Max Reported interval 1,801.5–1,834.5 2026-10-01 · Record1,709 #5 / 54 · claude-sonnet-5.5-high High Reported interval 1,693.4–1,724.6 2026-10-01 · RecordClaude Opus 5.5+109
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v1.5Coding Agent Index65.99 #2 / 19 · Claude Code - Opus 5.5 (max) Claude Code · Max 2026-10-01 · Record68.36 #1 / 19 · Claude Code - Sonnet 5.5 (max) Claude Code · Max 2026-10-01 · RecordClaude Sonnet 5.5+2.37

Official API pricing

Each row uses its listed pricing conditions. Cache writes are shown separately; subscription costs above retain their recorded quota basis. An em dash means that rate is not recorded.

List price per million tokens
Model / pricing conditionsCached inputInputCache writeOutput
Claude Opus 5.5Upstream referenceUpstream price reference$0.2$4—$20
Claude Sonnet 5.5Upstream referenceUpstream price reference$0.1$2—$10

How to read this comparison

Price ratios compare recorded USD/MTok under the same known workload. Raw measured totals, different workloads and unmetered access remain visible but are excluded from the lower-cost counts. Recorded allowances assume using the quota; your effective cost depends on utilization, cache mix, output mix and plan limits. Qualitative confidence is not an error bar.

Methodology and sources

More comparisons

All comparisons