Claude Fable 5.1 pricing: real cost per million tokens

What Anthropic's Claude Fable 5.1 really costs across 4 plans from 2 providers: monthly fees, usable allowances and real per-token prices, against the official API list price and independent leaderboards.

Data updated · How real prices are computed

As of 2026-10-08, the cheapest way to use Claude Fable 5.1 is Claude Max 20x (9/14+) at a real cost of about $0.1157 per million tokens ($200/month for roughly 1.728B tokens a month). We track 4 plans and API channels that serve Claude Fable 5.1.

Lowest real price
$0.1157/MTokClaude Max 20x (9/14+)
API list price
—
Most monthly tokens
1.728BClaude Max 20x (9/14+)
Plans & APIs
43 subscriptions · 1 metered API
Maker
Anthropic
Model ID
claude-fable-5.1
Providers
Anthropic, Factory
Leaderboards
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3, Terminal-Bench 4.0, Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA), Code Arena | WebDev Overall, Agent Arena · Overall (Ranking / Pareto), Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v1.5, OpenDesign Arena · Quality ranking

Plot Claude Fable 5.1 on the price–capability chart →

Claude Fable 5.1 plans and real prices

Real price = monthly fee ÷ tokens you can actually use in a month. “vs API” shows how many times cheaper than the official API list price (standard workload mix) the plan is. “Evidence” opens the full calculation and sources for that row.

Every tracked way to use Claude Fable 5.1, cheapest first
PlanProviderBillingMonthly feeMonthly tokensReal $/MTokvs APIConfidenceData date
Claude Max 20x (9/14+)AnthropicSubscription$200/mo1.728B$0.1157—MediumEvidence ↓
Claude Max 5x (9/14+)AnthropicSubscription$100/mo0.864B$0.1158—LowEvidence ↓
Droid MaxFactorySubscription$200/mo1.01B$0.1979—MediumEvidence ↓
Claude Fable 5.1 APIAnthropicMetered API——$0.805—HighEvidence ↓

Behind each number

For every plan: the data date, the exact calculation, the quota basis, how leaderboard scores were mapped, and the original adoption evidence with its sources.

Claude Max 20x (9/14+)Anthropic$0.115741/MTok
Data date
2026-09-04 – 2026-09-05 · sampled
Real price / MTok
$0.115741
Monthly tokens
1,728,000,000 (1.728B)
Quota confidence
Medium
Calculation
$200 / month ÷ 1,728,000,000 tokens × 1,000,000 ≈ $0.115741 / MTok
Quota basis

Not workload-normalized: sample lacks a token breakdown (or is an official absolute token table); raw tokens used as-is

Benchmark mapping
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3: Medium (5 configurations)
Terminal-Bench 4.0: Low (5 configurations)
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA): Low (5 configurations)
Code Arena | WebDev Overall: Low (1 configuration)
Agent Arena · Overall (Ranking / Pareto): Low (1 configuration)
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v1.5: Low (2 configurations)
OpenDesign Arena · Quality ranking: Low (1 configuration)Mapping confidence: how directly each score refers to the model served here.

Adoption evidence · source and rationale (translated from the Chinese record)

Maintainer-provided sample: same-day Max account /usage weekly quota 0%→19% corresponding to 2,443 turns and 285.6M raw tokens (cache read 283M + output 2.6M); claude-fable51-round3-2026-09-20.json; round9 timeline correction

3.006B→1.728B: the sample was measured during the 9/4~5 promo period — the 19% denominator is the promo pool 4.72B/week, not the permanent pool 3.925B — the old algorithm wrongly attached the blended equivalent pool to the permanent basis and did not split Opus's share; re-decomposed: consumption 0.19×47.2 = 897M equivalent, Opus share 113M raw weight 1, Fable share 172.5M raw → implied weight ≈4.54× Opus (lands inside Fable 5's measured 4.25~6.5 interval, self-consistent); monthly quota = 157×50%÷4.54; the dollar-weighting method independently verifies at 1.70B; the next day's 3,017 turns → 24% cross-checks (same-period basis consistent); single account n=1 → medium; not workload-normalized: the sample has only cache read + output, lacking write/input components, and was decomposed through a promo-period pool

Claude Max 5x (9/14+)Anthropic$0.115754/MTok
Data date
2026-08 – 2026-09-05 · derived; uses the data date of Claude Max 20x (9/14+) · claude-opus-5、claude-fable-5.1
Real price / MTok
$0.115754
Monthly tokens
863,900,000 (0.864B)
Quota confidence
Low
Calculation
$100 / month ÷ 863,900,000 tokens × 1,000,000 ≈ $0.115754 / MTok
Quota basis

Not workload-normalized: sample lacks a token breakdown (or is an official absolute token table); raw tokens used as-is

Benchmark mapping
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3: Medium (5 configurations)
Terminal-Bench 4.0: Low (5 configurations)
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA): Low (5 configurations)
Code Arena | WebDev Overall: Low (1 configuration)
Agent Arena · Overall (Ranking / Pareto): Low (1 configuration)
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v1.5: Low (2 configurations)
OpenDesign Arena · Quality ranking: Low (1 configuration)Mapping confidence: how directly each score refers to the model served here.

Adoption evidence · source and rationale (translated from the Chinese record)

Derived from same-plan claude-opus-5 7.85B × 0.11005486793415847

1.503B→863.931M: 78.5×0.5/4.54 — derived via the implied weight of the 20x same-frame sample (weight 2.61→4.54 after the round9 timeline correction), not an independent measurement; carrying a single weight across tiers remains an assumption (Fable 5's two differing tiers are the prior lesson); claude-fable51-round3/round9

Droid MaxFactory$0.197941/MTok
Data date
2026-09-29 · derived; uses the data date of Droid Max · claude-opus-5.5
Real price / MTok
$0.197941
Monthly tokens
1,010,400,000 (1.01B)
Quota confidence
Medium
Calculation
$200 / month ÷ 1,010,400,000 tokens × 1,000,000 ≈ $0.197941 / MTok
Quota basis

Anthropic workload: 97% cache reads / 2.5% cache writes / 0.5% output

Benchmark mapping
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3: Medium (5 configurations)
Terminal-Bench 4.0: Low (5 configurations)
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA): Low (5 configurations)
Code Arena | WebDev Overall: Low (1 configuration)
Agent Arena · Overall (Ranking / Pareto): Low (1 configuration)
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v1.5: Low (2 configurations)
OpenDesign Arena · Quality ranking: Low (1 configuration)Mapping confidence: how directly each score refers to the model served here.

Adoption evidence · source and rationale (translated from the Chinese record)

Derived from same-plan claude-opus-5.5 2.526B × 0.4

Factory official multipliers Opus 5.5 1.6× / claude-fable-5.1 4×: the same Standard Usage pool scaled by multiplier — not a measurement of this model; inherits the Opus 5.5 row's Anthropic-tier workload, not recomputed for each model's own price gap; docs.factory.ai/docs/models; droid-model-multipliers-2026-09-29.json

Claude Fable 5.1 APIAnthropic$0.805/MTok
Data date
2026-09-13 · official source date
Real price / MTok
$0.805
Quota confidence
High
Calculation
Metered API · public token prices weighted by the Anthropic workload (input share at the 5-minute cache-write rate).
Benchmark mapping
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3: Medium (5 configurations)
Terminal-Bench 4.0: Low (5 configurations)
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA): Low (5 configurations)
Code Arena | WebDev Overall: Low (1 configuration)
Agent Arena · Overall (Ranking / Pareto): Low (1 configuration)
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v1.5: Low (2 configurations)
OpenDesign Arena · Quality ranking: Low (1 configuration)Mapping confidence: how directly each score refers to the model served here.

Adoption evidence · source and rationale (translated from the Chinese record)

platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing; cache read $0.25 = base input×0.025 (other models 0.1×), in/out same price as Fable 5; claude-fable51-round1-2026-09-13.json

List price cached 0.25/in 10.0/out 50.0, cache write (5m) $12.5 × Anthropic unified workload 97.0%/2.50%/0.50% (the regular-input share is billed at the 5-minute cache-write price)

Claude Fable 5.1 benchmark scores

Highest archived configuration per leaderboard; ranks are among all models each board archives in this dataset. Scores are never mixed across boards.

Claude Fable 5.1 on independent leaderboards
LeaderboardMetricScoreRankConfigurationEffortHarnessConfigsSnapshot
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3Intelligence Index53.35#3 / 60Claude Fable 5.1 (max with fallback)Max—52026-10-01
Terminal-Bench 4.0Resolution Rate %57.88#3 / 18Claude Code - Fable 5.1 (max)MaxClaude Code52026-09-21
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA)Resolution Rate %55.05#5 / 53Artificial Analysis - Claude Fable 5.1 (xhigh with fallback)xhighArtificial Analysis52026-10-01
Code Arena | WebDev OverallArena Score1,751#4 / 54claude-fable-5.1-maxMax—12026-09-30
Agent Arena · Overall (Ranking / Pareto)Net Improvement %14.55#1 / 39Claude Fable 5.1 (Max)Max—12026-09-30
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v1.5Coding Agent Index62.22#4 / 19Claude Code - Fable 5.1 (max) (with fallback)MaxClaude Code22026-10-01
OpenDesign Arena · Quality rankingAverage task score80.3#9 / 16Claude Fable 5.1—OpenDesign12026-10-01

Every archived configuration

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3 5 configurations
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3: every archived configuration (Intelligence Index)
ConfigurationScoreScore intervalHarness / effort / modeSource task cost (mean / median)CheckedLinks
Claude Fable 5.1 (max with fallback)53.3549—— / Max / —— / —2026-10-01Source · Archive
Claude Fable 5.1 (xhigh with fallback)53.2033—— / xhigh / —— / —2026-10-01Source · Archive
Claude Fable 5.1 (high with fallback)51.1516—— / High / —— / —2026-10-01Source · Archive
Claude Fable 5.1 (medium with fallback)48.9206—— / Medium / —— / —2026-10-01Source · Archive
Claude Fable 5.1 (low with fallback)46.8163—— / Low / —— / —2026-10-01Source · Archive
Terminal-Bench 4.0 5 configurations
Terminal-Bench 4.0: every archived configuration (Resolution Rate %)
ConfigurationScoreScore intervalHarness / effort / modeSource task cost (mean / median)CheckedLinks
Claude Code - Fable 5.1 (max)Official Terminal-Bench 4.0 leaderboard row; score belongs to this harness × model × effort configuration.57.8854.12 – 61.64Claude Code / Max / —— / —2026-10-01Source · Archive
Claude Code - Fable 5.1 (xhigh)Official Terminal-Bench 4.0 leaderboard row; score belongs to this harness × model × effort configuration.57.8854.52 – 61.24Claude Code / xhigh / —— / —2026-10-01Source · Archive
Claude Code - Fable 5.1 (high)Official Terminal-Bench 4.0 leaderboard row; score belongs to this harness × model × effort configuration.54.5551.11 – 57.99Claude Code / High / —— / —2026-10-01Source · Archive
Claude Code - Fable 5.1 (medium)Official Terminal-Bench 4.0 leaderboard row; score belongs to this harness × model × effort configuration.53.9450.55 – 57.33Claude Code / Medium / —— / —2026-10-01Source · Archive
Claude Code - Fable 5.1 (low)Official Terminal-Bench 4.0 leaderboard row; score belongs to this harness × model × effort configuration.43.3339.72 – 46.94Claude Code / Low / —— / —2026-10-01Source · Archive
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) 5 configurations
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA): every archived configuration (Resolution Rate %)
ConfigurationScoreScore intervalHarness / effort / modeSource task cost (mean / median)CheckedLinks
Artificial Analysis - Claude Fable 5.1 (xhigh with fallback)AA's own-harness independent measurement of Terminal-Bench 4.0 (the terminalBench40 field in the models-board payload, fraction×100); scored separately from the official tbench.ai board.55.0505—Artificial Analysis / xhigh / —— / —2026-10-01Source · Archive
Artificial Analysis - Claude Fable 5.1 (max with fallback)AA's own-harness independent measurement of Terminal-Bench 4.0 (the terminalBench40 field in the models-board payload, fraction×100); scored separately from the official tbench.ai board.52.0202—Artificial Analysis / Max / —— / —2026-10-01Source · Archive
Artificial Analysis - Claude Fable 5.1 (high with fallback)AA's own-harness independent measurement of Terminal-Bench 4.0 (the terminalBench40 field in the models-board payload, fraction×100); scored separately from the official tbench.ai board.52.0202—Artificial Analysis / High / —— / —2026-10-01Source · Archive
Artificial Analysis - Claude Fable 5.1 (medium with fallback)AA's own-harness independent measurement of Terminal-Bench 4.0 (the terminalBench40 field in the models-board payload, fraction×100); scored separately from the official tbench.ai board.44.9495—Artificial Analysis / Medium / —— / —2026-10-01Source · Archive
Artificial Analysis - Claude Fable 5.1 (low with fallback)AA's own-harness independent measurement of Terminal-Bench 4.0 (the terminalBench40 field in the models-board payload, fraction×100); scored separately from the official tbench.ai board.40.404—Artificial Analysis / Low / —— / —2026-10-01Source · Archive
Code Arena | WebDev Overall 1 configuration
Code Arena | WebDev Overall: every archived configuration (Arena Score)
ConfigurationScoreScore intervalHarness / effort / modeSource task cost (mean / median)CheckedLinks
claude-fable-5.1-max1,7511,741.3 – 1,760.7— / Max / —— / —2026-10-01Source · Archive
Agent Arena · Overall (Ranking / Pareto) 1 configuration
Agent Arena · Overall (Ranking / Pareto): every archived configuration (Net Improvement %)
ConfigurationScoreScore intervalHarness / effort / modeSource task cost (mean / median)CheckedLinks
Claude Fable 5.1 (Max)14.5512.63 – 16.47— / Max / —— / $4.442026-10-01Source · Archive
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v1.5 2 configurations
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v1.5: every archived configuration (Coding Agent Index)
ConfigurationScoreScore intervalHarness / effort / modeSource task cost (mean / median)CheckedLinks
Claude Code - Fable 5.1 (max) (with fallback)Score belongs to this named agent/harness × model configuration; it is not a harness-independent model measurement. indexScore stored as percent (raw fraction × 100).62.2225—Claude Code / Max / —$12.39 / —2026-10-01Source · Archive
Devin Fusion CLI - Claude Fable 5.1 XHigh + SWE-2 MediumScore belongs to this named agent/harness × model configuration; it is not a harness-independent model measurement. indexScore stored as percent (raw fraction × 100).61.6826—Devin Fusion CLI / xhigh / —$7.897 / —2026-10-01Source · Archive
OpenDesign Arena · Quality ranking 1 configuration
OpenDesign Arena · Quality ranking: every archived configuration (Average task score)
ConfigurationScoreScore intervalHarness / effort / modeSource task cost (mean / median)CheckedLinks
Claude Fable 5.180.3—OpenDesign / — / —$3.66 / —2026-10-01Source · Archive

These are reference mappings, not benchmarks of a subscription or API channel. Harness and quota-measurement effort alignment are unverified. Source task costs are not subscription task costs.

Frequently asked questions

How much does Claude Fable 5.1 really cost per million tokens?

Measured as monthly fee ÷ tokens you can actually use, Claude Fable 5.1 ranges from $0.1157 (Claude Max 20x (9/14+)) to $0.805 (Claude Fable 5.1 API) per million tokens.

Which subscription gives the most Claude Fable 5.1 usage?

Claude Max 20x (9/14+) allows roughly 1.728B tokens of Claude Fable 5.1 per month for $200.

How does Claude Fable 5.1 score on independent leaderboards?

Claude Fable 5.1 has scores on 7 leaderboards; its strongest placement is 14.55 (Net Improvement %) on Agent Arena · Overall (Ranking / Pareto), #1 of 39 models tracked.

Who makes Claude Fable 5.1, and where can I use it?

Claude Fable 5.1 (model ID claude-fable-5.1) is made by Anthropic and is available through Anthropic, Factory.

More Anthropic models

Other Anthropic models by lowest real price
ModelLowest real $/MTokCheapest planPlans
Claude Haiku 5.5$0.00028Claude Max 5x (9/14+)4
Claude Sonnet 5.5$0.00273Claude Max 5x (9/14+)6
Claude Sonnet 5$0.00309Claude Pro4
Claude Opus 5.5$0.00545Claude Max 5x (9/14+)9
Claude Opus 4.8$0.00772Claude Pro3
Claude Opus 5$0.00772Claude Pro5
Claude Fable 5$0.1083Claude Max 5x (9/14+)4